Pricing comparison

GPT-4o mini vs DeepSeek V4 Flash

Per-token pricing, full-workload cost ladders, and monthly volume projections. Numbers sourced directly from each provider's rate card.

OpenAI

GPT-4o mini

Input
$0.15 / 1M
Output
$0.60 / 1M
Cached input
$0.075 / 1M
Context
128K
Max output
16K

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4 Flash

Input
$0.14 / 1M
Output
$0.28 / 1M
Cached input
$0.003 / 1M
Context
1M
Max output
384K

Cost per request

Four common workload shapes, input tokens and a 1:2 output ratio (a standard chat/completion pattern). Long-context surcharges apply automatically where the provider charges them.

ScenarioTokens (in / out)GPT-4o miniDeepSeek V4 FlashWinner
Short prompt100 / 200$0.0001$0.0001DeepSeek V4 Flash
Typical request1,000 / 2,000$0.0013$0.0007DeepSeek V4 Flash
Long document10,000 / 5,000$0.0045$0.0028DeepSeek V4 Flash
Large prompt100,000 / 10,000$0.0210$0.0168DeepSeek V4 Flash

Monthly bill at scale

Projected monthly cost at typical request volume, assuming the "typical request" shape above (1k in, 2k out).

TrafficReq / monthGPT-4o miniDeepSeek V4 FlashDelta
Small SaaS1,000$1.35$0.70DeepSeek V4 Flash -$0.65
Growing product10,000$13.50$7.00DeepSeek V4 Flash -$6.50
Heavy usage100,000$135.00$70.00DeepSeek V4 Flash -$65.00

Which should you use?

For the typical chat-shape request (~1k input, 2k output), DeepSeek V4 Flash comes out 93% cheaper. If you're picking one as the default, that's usually the right choice on cost alone.

DeepSeek V4 Flash wins on both sides of the bill - cheaper input and cheaper output. If the quality gap is in your favour, there's no cost argument for the other side.

Context window differs: DeepSeek V4 Flash holds 1M of input vs 128K on the other side. If you regularly push past the smaller ceiling, the comparison ends there.

Live cost calculator

Type in any token counts - both prices update instantly. Uses base input/output rates (no cache discount, no long-context tier).

GPT-4o mini

$0.0004

per request

DeepSeek V4 Flash

$0.0003

per request

DeepSeek V4 Flash is $0.0002 cheaper per request (37.8% less).

Try both in the estimator →

Drop your actual prompt in, tokens are counted with the provider's own tokenizer, and the dollar number matches what lands on your invoice.

Frequently asked

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o mini or DeepSeek V4 Flash?
On a typical 1,000-input / 2,000-output request, DeepSeek V4 Flash costs ~$0.0007 vs ~$0.0013 on GPT-4o mini. Input or output rates can flip the answer for very lopsided workloads - see the cost ladder above.
What's the difference in per-token pricing?
GPT-4o mini charges $0.15 per 1M input tokens and $0.60 per 1M output tokens. DeepSeek V4 Flash charges $0.14 / $0.28 per 1M.
Which has the bigger context window?
DeepSeek V4 Flash is larger (1M) vs 128K on the other.
Is there a cached-input discount on either?
GPT-4o mini caches at $0.075 per 1M (50% off). DeepSeek V4 Flash caches at $0.003 per 1M (98% off). Workloads with repeated static prefixes see the biggest savings.
How fresh is this comparison?
GPT-4o mini was re-verified on 2026-04-06 and DeepSeek V4 Flash on 2026-07-01 against each provider's published rate card. Calcis re-checks every row on a rolling schedule and re-deploys when a provider changes pricing.

GPT-4o mini verified 2026-04-06 · DeepSeek V4 Flash verified 2026-07-01. Rate cards at OpenAI and DeepSeek.